Interagency Barriers and the Boston Bombing

Interagency Barriers and the Boston Bombing

With the investigation of the Boston bombing still underway and largely concealed, it is difficult to access the origin of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s radicalization. What facts can be gleaned, however, are the interagency flops and/or shortcomings in monitoring Tsarnaev’s burgeoning extremist activity.

The April 15th attacks underscored a continuing trend in post-9/11 America: agencies are not ready to fully share intelligence. The U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) historically suffers from interagency rivalries and reluctance to share information. A decade after 9/11, though, the bombing in Boston demonstrates that advocacy of sharing still suffers at Federal, state, and local levels of Government.

Testimony from Boston Police, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other stakeholder representatives at a House Homeland Security Committee on 9 May 2013 conveyed cross-IC agency and law enforcement frustrations from not sharing intelligence. Information concerning the details of Tsarnaev’s six-month trip to the Dagestani republic of Russia, Russia’s request for information on the suspect, and the 2011 federal investigation were not made known to Boston investigators. Some intelligence was there and a stronger collaborative relationship between the IC and law enforcement community could have been the key to resolving the communication challenges.

At the behest of Russia, the FBI’s investigation of Tsarnaev turned up no loose stones to warrant further inquiry. However, it did provide the Department of Homeland Security reason to decline his application for American citizenship after they discovered his interview with FBI officials. While not the direct result of interagency cooperation, the FBI’s investigation did provide a positive outlook on the current sharing of certain data. More could have and can be done to prevent future Boston Bombings.

By the time of the bombing, several agencies possessed key intelligence regarding Tsarnaev. However, the compartmentalization of that intelligence resulted in a clear lack of communication. In the post-9/11 age, federal, state, and local officials should look to this case to examine the limitations and consequences of non-collaboration and the sharing of intelligence. Augmented interagency relationship building needs to occur to ensure that the US learns from the hard lessons of interagency barriers or more Boston bombings could occur in the future.  

Contributors

* Arc Aspicio |

Arc Aspicio is a management, strategy, and technology consulting firm that takes a mission-oriented approach to complex client challenges. Focused on innovation, Arc Aspicio provides services in strategy, design, human capital, operations, analytics and visualization, technology and information sharing. The company is known for a strong, collaborative culture that values gratitude, provides leadership opportunities, and explores the future. Our teams take a human-centered approach to working with clients and are flexible and responsive within dynamic Government client environments where missions evolve and new priorities arise sometimes even daily. We thrive on these situations and promote continuous improvement and new ideas. And, #welovedogs! Follow us on Twitter @arcaspicio or learn more at www.arcaspicio.com.

Lynn Ann Casey / Chief Executive Officer info@arcaspicio.com 703.465.2060

LeadersNest Names Lynn Ann Casey a FedFem Award Honoree

LeadersNest Names Lynn Ann Casey a FedFem Award Honoree

Washington, DC, October 19, 2018 — LeadersNest named Arc Aspicio CEO Lynn Ann Casey a FedFem Award Honoree. The FedFem awards salute high-impact women executives and leaders of the government contracting community. FedFem Award Honorees blend their entrepreneurial courage and Federal government support that effectively impacts the industry, national economy, and the local marketplace. 

Boosting the Mission: Developing Acquisition Requirements Guidance

Boosting the Mission: Developing Acquisition Requirements Guidance

To keep up with the fast pace of change in the field of Government acquisitions, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components are developing their own acquisition requirements (AR) policies. However, without specific timeframes to finalize these policies, DHS agencies often lack guidance on how to develop ARs. Among DHS agencies, the U.S. Coast Guard is leading the way with their own formal policy to describe this process. To compliment the U.S. Coast Guard’s policy, DHS created the Joint Requirements Integration and Management System (JRIMS) to offer direction for agencies—to review, validate, and suggest solutions for capability gaps and requirements.

Top Qualities of Design Thinking Leaders

Top Qualities of Design Thinking Leaders

Design Thinking is on the rise in the business world. Design Thinking leaders focus on creating the best product for their clients and working with the experiences and insight of fellow coworkers. Some of the key characteristics of Design Thinking leaders present themselves in individuals who are open and subject themselves to vulnerability with clients and coworkers. These qualities help leaders to connect and build relationships with others. They also create an open flow of communication that allows for others to better share their knowledge to align with and understand the company's mission.

Think, Key, Speak: Purposeful Communications

Think, Key, Speak: Purposeful Communications

I spent the early years of my career in the United States Navy as a Naval Flight Officer on the E-2C Hawkeye, the Navy’s aircraft carrier-based Airborne Early Warning and Command and Control platform. The various missions of the aircraft demand that aircrew monitor up to ten radio frequencies, and actively speak on three or four of those, at any given moment in flight.

How Can Communities Ready Themselves for a Major Power Grid Event?

How Can Communities Ready Themselves for a Major Power Grid Event?

Communities are often the foundation for an expedited recovery following major events. But how can communities strengthen their response to, for example, a major cyber-attack or natural event, such as an Electronic Magnetic Pulse solar flare? A United States electrical grid failure could destroy a number of the nation’s high voltage transformers causing widespread outages for several weeks, even months. A public health emergency could quickly ensue particularly among the vulnerable as the ripple effects cause significant societal disruption. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) strategic plan encourages and empowers communities to prepare for the inevitable impacts of future disasters. How can communities prime for major events?

Confessions of a Chief Strategy Officer

Confessions of a Chief Strategy Officer

I’ll admit it, I was a little smug. After more than 20 years in the consulting business helping clients develop, implement, and integrate their strategies, I thought… “how hard could it be to do the same things for my own company – a company of consultants?” I had the commitment of my leadership, a group of talented people, and a plan and resources to grow the company. We had energy and we had a great process and tools to successful. What could go wrong?