DNA: The Last Biometric

DNA:
The Last
Biometric

The integrity of the U.S. immigration system rests in the Department of Homeland Security’s ability to positively identify known and unknown individuals throughout the travel continuum. The travel continuum begins with the visa application process and continues through arrival at Ports of Entry, application for immigration benefits, investigation and removal of immigration offenders and exit from the host country. Collection of biometric information such as fingerprints, iris, and facial images has vastly improved the efficiency and accuracy of this often arduous identification process.

Moving Beyond Fingerprints

When the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) launched its US-VISIT program in 2003, it opted to use fingerprint biometrics to establish the identities of foreign nationals entering the U.S. It has since biometrically enrolled nearly 100 million foreign nationals. In this context, collection of fingerprints from foreign nationals has proven to facilitate legitimate travel while also enabling immigration officers to focus on potentially dangerous or threatening individuals.

The fingerprint alone, however, may not always offer sufficient information to establish an individual’s identity in an immigration and border management context. Some visa categories, for example, require applicants to establish biological relationships to sponsors in the U.S. In other cases, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents may encounter foreign nationals with possible links to crime, but discover there are no latent fingerprints (i.e., the impression left by finger ridges invisible to the naked eye that is often found at the scene of a crime) on file with which to positively identify these suspected foreign criminals. Law enforcement authorities often use latent fingerprints to prosecute suspected criminals.

The fact that fingerprints alone may not fulfill the mission needs of DHS components operating in these particular circumstances has lead many experts to question the value of the use of biometrics. While these vulnerabilities may exist, it is important to note there are biometric complements to the fingerprint. DNA, for example can both establish a familial relationship and place a person at a crime scene where no latent prints exist.

DNA use in a border management and immigration environment may initially seem excessive and perhaps even unjustified. However, as DHS mission needs and ‘in scope’ immigrant populations evolve, DNA use may emerge as viable biometric of the future.

Figure 1 depicts the adoption of biometrics (left to right) in the mission-critical function of verifying the identification of individuals throughout the travel continuum – both in the U.S. and other countries around the world.  Biometrics, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, and iris, are often used in combination to increase the accuracy of identifications.

Proven Use of DNA in the Immigration Environment

To reinforce the security, integrity and facility of the immigration system, DHS consistently researches emerging biometric identification technologies and their potential applications to identity management. One such biometric technology is DNA. Though some research suggests that because DNA testing is not an automated process, it is not a true biometric recognition system, both policy makers and scientists agree that the accuracy of DNA testing might result in future biometric applications.

DNA testing, in an ideal environment, requires at least four hours of processing. Always mindful of potential impacts to the efficiency of the immigration process, DHS recognizes that DNA testing is a viable option in limited benefits application cases where establishing biological relationships is a fundamental component of the adjudication process.

For example, the Priority Three Refugee Family Reunification Visa (P-3) requires applicants to demonstrate a biological relationship to a post-flight refugee legally residing in the U.S. After an eight month internal review of the P-3 application process, the Department of Figure 1 Biometrics enhance identity verification in a border management and homeland security context. DNA is an emerging biometric in this area.State and DHS jointly resolved to suspend applications to the P-3 visa category. A Department of State Fact Sheet, published in February 2009, concluded that in approximately 86 percent of the P-3 cases reviewed, individuals claiming to be family members either refused to take the DNA test or their DNA did not match that of their alleged relative.

In an effort to bolster the integrity of the immigration benefits system, DHS’ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) anticipates continued collection of DNA from applicants where the Immigration Nationality Act (INA) requires that a legal relationship exist between the applicant and the US-based relative. Concerns surrounding applicant privacy, DNA database management and the integrity of overseas DNA testing centers will continue to affect adjudication outcomes in categories such as the P-3 Family Reunification Visa. While routine collection of DNA in a Port of Entry environment is unlikely due to processing constraints, it appears that DNA testing will continue to play a critical role in streamlining the immigration benefits process.

Could DNA Break the Code to Identity in Immigration Enforcement?

Future DNA use in a homeland security context may also extend to the immigration enforcement arena. In January 2009, the Department of Justice approved the collection of DNA samples from people arrested and detained for suspected immigration violations. Historically, immigration enforcement officers have collected fingerprints and photographs from suspected immigration offenders. However, as DNA studies demonstrate a 1-in-6-billion chance of two people having the same genetic profile, DNA might prove a valuable tool in prosecuting immigration violators with potential criminal histories.

DHS faces critical challenges as it seeks to minimize the compromise that often occurs between securing the nation and facilitating legitimate trade and travel. DNA has the potential to reduce visa processing times, prevent immigration fraud, and protect the U.S. borders and its interior when applied to an appropriate in-scope population and used in conjunction with more traditional biometric systems such as fingerprint, face recognition and iris.

 

Blog Border Security

Contributors

* Arc Aspicio |

Arc Aspicio is a management, strategy, and technology consulting firm that takes a mission-oriented approach to complex client challenges. As a rapidly growing company, Arc Aspicio has a bold strategy for 2016-2018 that drives growth through new capabilities in strategy, design, human capital, data analytics, information sharing, cybersecurity, and strategic communications. The company is known for a strong, collaborative culture that values gratitude – for its clients and its great team. And, #welovedogs! Follow us on Twitter @arcaspicio or learn more at www.arcaspicio.com.

Lynn Ann Casey / Chief Executive Officer
info@arcaspicio.com
703.465.2060

Mr. Roboto: Your Newest Coworker

Mr. Roboto: Your Newest Coworker

Could your next cubemate be a robot? Elon Musk, the Tesla and SpaceX founder, is building our future coworkers and forming a world filled with Artificial Intelligence (AI) that could “beat us in just about everything,” including our jobs. As Musk attempts to create a real-life iRobot, many advantages and a possible partnership arise with this future. How can the Government and Homeland Security prepare and welcome new technological advancements?

Data + Strategy: Using Data to Inform Agency Strategy

Data + Strategy: Using Data to Inform Agency Strategy

Understanding the types of data available, gaining access to the right data, and making sense of data are daunting tasks for most organizations as they develop a strategy to meet mission demands and enterprise-wide goals. Data is especially challenging for the Government, yet provides the opportunity for insight for leaders as they strategically move their agencies forward.

Workplace Morale is Going to the Dogs… Literally!

Workplace Morale is Going to the Dogs… Literally!

There are few greater feelings than a dog’s unconditional love. And some are finding that a dog’s love can help combat stress at work. Secretary Zinke of the Interior Department announced his intent for "Doggy Days" where he encouraged employees to bring their canine companions to work on designated days. More than 80 dogs arrived for first event and the overjoyed employees immediately scheduled the next.

Accelerating FITARA Compliance: Five Steps That Leaders Can Take Today

Accelerating FITARA Compliance: Five Steps That Leaders Can Take Today

Implementing change is not always easy, but it is always necessary. Federal agencies have been working to transform how they acquire and manage Federal information technology (IT). The Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA) in December 2014 has increased visibility into this transformation.Although FITARA enhances the authority and accountability of Chief Information Officers (CIOs) in reviewing and approving major IT investment projects, CIOs continue to look for new ways to implement best practices at their agencies.

Combating the Rise of Transnational Criminal Organizations

Combating the Rise of Transnational Criminal Organizations

Crime, corruption, and violence – particularly involving drug, human, and weapons trafficking – continue to increase at an alarming rate in the U.S. Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) are a critical part of this trend and pose a serious and growing threat to homeland security – at our borders and beyond.U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is at the tip of the spear to combat TCOs. With the context that the first goal in their Vision and Strategy 2020 Strategic Plan is Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime, CBP is focusing on disrupting TCOs responsible for the cross-border trafficking of illegal drugs, humans, and guns.

Design Thinking: Putting the Citizen at the Heart of Lasting Change

Design Thinking: Putting the Citizen at the Heart of Lasting Change

For the past few decades, there has been a growing increase in the digital channels available to network with the Federal government. These channels have made it easier for the public to interact and elicit responses from elected officials.These growing interactions have increased expectations for Government to be more transparent and collaborative. From the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to the Department of State (DOS), Design Thinking transformations have begun to develop and modernize programs to be more human-centered. Agencies and programs beholden to serve the public good should logically adopt a problem-solving mindset that places the individual at the heart of any lasting changes.

Using Behavioral Science to Improve Mission Outcomes

Using Behavioral Science to Improve Mission Outcomes

Although behavioral science has been studied and applied within academia for decades, recently the concept has emerged everywhere – from Silicon Valley tech giants such as Google and Uber, to various Government agencies including the Department of Education, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Agriculture.But defining and applying such a broad and sometimes-nebulous discipline can prove difficult. What exactly is behavioral science? How can the Government use the concepts and lessons learned effectively?

Crowdsourcing to Improve Security

Crowdsourcing to Improve Security

Many of us are familiar with the idea of crowdsourcing. Corporations and the Government both use crowdsourcing to generate data, raise awareness campaigns, and produce ideas. So, what if we used crowdsourcing to enhance our security and bridge communication gaps between the Government and American citizens at the same time?

Homeland Security Managers = Innovative Leaders

Homeland Security Managers = Innovative Leaders

The search for and implementation of innovative methods to protect the homeland should play an important role in homeland security managers’ approach to how they guide their organizations. Citizens expect government leaders to propose and implement organizational, acquisition, and personnel management practices that enhance our nation’s ability to prepare for and mitigate potential threats. They expect these to make them safer and the nation more secure.